God is Not a Guy, and Neither Am I!
Guest post by Jann Aldredge-Clanton
More and more I find myself responding, “I am not a guy,” to waiters in restaurants, to educated people at conferences, and even to people in progressive churches who refer to groups of women and men as “you guys.” Sometimes these are groups of all women, and still they call us “you guys.”
So the idea for this article has been stirring in me for a while. Its title was inspired by the work of Jeanette Blonigen Clancy, a Catholic lay theologian who writes a blog called “God Is Not Three Guys in the Sky,” and David Marks, a Presbyterian music minister whose blog is called “God Is Not a Guy.”
Just when I thought we’d about eliminated the so-called “generic” use of “man” because it really is exclusive, up pops “you guys” almost everywhere. Women and girls seem to use “you guys” as much as men and boys do. So why do females think they’re included in “you guys”? These same women usually protest loudly when they are referred to as “men” or “man,” as the King James and other older versions of the Bible do and as many churches still do. So why do they think it’s okay to be called by the male word “guys”?
You may be thinking that I’m just being picky, that there are many more serious problems in the world and even in the world of patriarchal language. But exclusively male language, even the seemingly innocuous “you guys,” devalues women and girls through this exclusion, contributing to a culture in which violence and discrimination against women and girls are still all too prevalent.
Kendra Weddle Irons writes in Christian Feminism Today’s FemFaith blog that many people dismiss as unimportant critiques of phrases such as “chairmen” for women as well as men. “Yet, we begin to uncover the depths of our sexism if we substitute ‘women’ for ‘men’ in these cases.” We would not refer to a man as “chairwoman,” so why is it okay to refer to a woman as “chairman”?
The same goes for “you guys.” We would not refer to a group that included men as “you gals.” And we would not call an individual girl or woman a “guy,” so why would we call a group that includes women “you guys”? In the English-speaking world, it finally became clear that a group that includes women cannot be referred to as “man” or “mankind” because an individual woman cannot be called “man.” So the “generic” use of “man” left the grammar books in the 1980s.
But now “you guys” sneaks in all over the place! It is insidious the ways in which our male-dominant culture continues to perpetuate itself. Letha Dawson Scanzoni writes in FemFaith: “In our culture, woman is considered to be subsumed under the category called man, the male being considered the default model or generic representative of what a human being is. Woman, the womb-man, is seen in relation to man.”
Calling girls and women “guys” makes femaleness invisible. It says that males are still the measure of all things. Novelist Alice Walker, in this short video clip, gives a powerful commentary on the “dangerous and revealing” use of “guys” to refer to women—dangerous because it “erases” women.
Likewise, it is dangerous for God to be named and imaged exclusively as a guy. This exclusively masculine Deity persists in almost all religions and cultures. Making the Ultimate Power of the universe male gives the strongest support imaginable to the dominance of men and the devaluation of women and transgender people. I have written extensively about the suffering that comes to all people and all creation from male-dominated theology that has at its foundation an exclusively masculine naming of Deity, and about the healing, peace, and justice that come from gender-balancednames and images of Deity.
Sometimes I’ve noticed that churches where I and others have advocated for inclusive language will increase references to Jesus in worship services to avoid gender-balanced language. Hymns, readings, and prayers continue to be filled with “he,” “him,” “his,” and the church feels fine because everybody knows that Jesus was male. Never mind that these churches also teach that all believers of all genders are the body of Christ and that the resurrected Jesus lives in all believers of all genders and that scripture and church tradition link Jesus and feminine “Wisdom” (Sophia in the Greek language of the Christian Scriptures).
Just as people think they can avoid exclusive language for divinity by increasing references to Jesus, many people think they’re avoiding exclusive language for humanity by increasing references to “you guys.” Somehow they have convinced themselves that “you guys,” like “Jesus-He,” is inclusive. After all, they’ve given up “man” and “mankind” for mixed-gendered groups, and some have even given up references to God as “He.”
Some women who understand that “you guys” excludes them say they don’t challenge it because they just don’t have the energy to challenge all the sexist language and practices that they experience. And being called “you guys” seems rather harmless compared to much of the other sexism they experience. I certainly understand. I must admit that I don’t always challenge being referred to as a “guy,” and I often let other sexist language slide by in order to be heard instead of dismissed as just “too sensitive” or as a “single issue” person. And sometimes I also get tired of challenging sexist language and practice.
But “you guys” is really easy to avoid. There are plenty of good substitutes. Many people, including women, tell me they don’t like “gals” so they don’t want to say “you guys and gals,” also because this phrase excludes and erases transgender people. It’s easy to avoid “guys” and “gals” altogether and to choose a truly inclusive term like “you all,” still only two little words. Or, if you’re from the South, as I am, you can simply say, “y’all.” Another inclusive choice is “you folks” or “you people,” or just “you.” The word “you” can be singular or plural, and it includes all genders. So instead of greeting a group of people with “It’s good to see you guys today,” say, “It’s good to see you today,” or “It’s good to see you all today.”
This simple change, like calling God “She” as well as “He,” can make a big difference in the lives of children and adults, helping us all to truly believe that people of all genders are created equally in the divine image.
So I will keep on writing and preaching and saying, “God is not a guy, and neither am I!”
Copyright 2013 by Jann Aldredge-Clanton and EEWC-Christian Feminism Today. All rights reserved. Originally published on the Christian Feminism Today. Reposted with permission.
April 23, 2012 a sample of Jann's work
April 23, 2012 a sample of Jann's work
Sing to the Creator a new song;
make melody and dance for joy.
Sing songs of thanksgiving to the One with many names;
make new songs to praise the vastness of the Creator:
sing a new song to Ruah, Spirit of Creation;
sing a new song to El Shaddai, the Breasted One;
sing a new song to the Comforting Friend;
sing a new song to the Rock of Salvation,
sing a new song to the soaring Mother Eagle;
sing a new song to the nurturing Mother Hen;
sing a new song to the Fount of all Blessings;
sing a new song to Mother-Father Creator;
sing a new song to Sister-Brother Sustainer;
sing a new song to Christ-Sophia, Giver of New Life;
Let all that hath breath,
sing a new song. (based on Psalm 149:1-3)
Jann Aldredge-Clanton, Praying with Christ-Sophia: Services for Healing and Renewal.
This excerpt from “Psalms of Thanksgiving” demonstrates the beauty and inspiration in literature honoring the Divine Feminine. Ruah, Hebrew for "Spirit" (literally "breath"), was a feminine figure who played a prominent role in the Hebrew Scriptures, which Christians call the Old Testament.
Readers will see many more of Jann’s contributions, and I will feature her works in my presentation at the Mankato, MN, Women & Spirituality Conference this fall—“Inclusive God-talk.” Those of us in the Christian tradition who are aware that patriarchal God-talk insidiously promotes sexism and idolatry can help to transform its immoral power structure by opportunely inserting inclusive God-talk into liturgical and everyday language.