Dogs, literalism & synchronicity

By -
I’m speaking to a high school class this afternoon, and fortuitously—I’ll say it was synchronistic (Click on paranormal posts to read about synchronicity)—someone sent me this wonderfully comic debate on the marquees of two churches facing each other on a busy street in Colorado. It’s a perfect illustration of religious literalism. I’ll see if the high school students get it.

All dogs go to heaven

Only humans go to heaven Read the Bible

God loves all his creation Dogs included

Dogs don’t have souls This is not open for debate

Catholic dogs go to heaven Presbyterian dogs can talk to their pastor

Converting to Catholicism does not magically grant your dog a soul

Free dog souls with conversion

Dogs are animals There aren’t any rocks in heaven either

All rocks go to heaven

Dogs & literalism

I was happy to see that the Catholic one showed a whimsical appreciation of literalism and had fun with it—dogs and rocks go to heaven. One email responder, a fully alive Catholic, wrote, " . . .but no cats enter the pearly gates!"
They do TOO.
See comments below.

Comments

Diane said…
I can hardly wait to read about how your interaction with the high schoolers goes. Should be VERY interesting! Is it a public school or private Christian school? And how did you get invited to speak? What topic do they "think" you will be speaking of?
April 20, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Jeanette said…
The name of the public school class was World Religions, an elective for seniors and a few juniors. I was referred to it by a scheduler for a senior citizens group to whom I probably will speak later in the year. It turned out I'd worked with the teacher before when I was supervising student teachers.

It was great. The teacher had said I should take only 40 minutes because she wanted a student group to present for the rest of their 70 minute block, but several times when I asked about stopping, she told me to go on and finally said to take the rest of the period.

I know H.S. students, and these were on a higher level of understanding than I expected. They quickly understood the difference between literal and figurative language. There was some discomfort with the concept of "myth" in an evangelical-type believer, but it seemed to wane as I presented more information. The group also included a Mormon, an atheist, traditional Catholics, and someone with some diversity in her background.

After class I remarked on the high level of their understanding--I'm frustrated by the number of adults who don't get abstract concepts and therefore don't understand my subject matter. The teacher said she's noticing that students today demonstrate higher order thinking.

This is the first H.S. class I've addressed on this topic and now I'd like more. I think world religions should be taught in all high schools.
April 20, 2009 at 4:10 PM
Bird said…
Haha. That is a great illustration. I am glad you received such a great response!
April 20, 2009 at 8:36 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Goddess in the Bible

By -
Linguistic, archaeological, and scriptural studies reveal that the people of the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) worshipped the Goddess. Their literature is suffused with female images of the Holy One. This information came to me primarily from Raphael Patai in The Hebrew Goddess , Asphodel Long in The Absent Mother , and Phyllis Trible in God and the Rhetoric of Sexuality . An exclusively male God-image does not meet the psychological needs of humanity, and—here’s the surprise—it does not fully reflect our Judaeo-Christian heritage. According to Patai, "historical scrutiny" shows that for centuries following the Law of Moses, sole worship of Yahweh by the Hebrews "remained a demand rather than a fact," because the people chosen by Yahweh also worshipped Canaanite deities. In light of the thundering Bible prophets, that did not surprise me. What dumbfounded me was the scope, the popularity, and the legitimacy of Goddess worship as revealed by researchers free of ma...
Read more

Grace & spirituality, Part 2 (Guest Post)

By -
Those of you familiar with my conversation with Jeanette know that I'm an atheist; I do not believe in an anthropomorphic, creative entity called "God." I think that all the universe is natural - there is no "supernatural." But I also think that there is spirit, human spirit being part of that. And to me, spirit is tangible, natural, a function of the universal matter, light. I experience it, I can hear it, see it, feel it. It is a matter of attention and perception. Scientists, even atheist scientists, will someday identify how it works. Carl Jung, many years ago, spoke of observing “synchronicity”. He also posited the notion of the “collective unconscious”. I happen to think that there also exists a "collective sub-conscience," a universal knowing of yin and yang that connects us all to each other and everything else. It is in those places, I believe, that we find spirituality. I don't think that believing these things are molecular and sub-atomi...
Read more

Eckhart's Trinity

By -
The nexus of divinity and humanity lies not in one man but in the inner core of all creation . . . The only-through-Jesus stance violates the Nazarene’s message, but the image of Jesus Christ helps our human minds to recognize the divine-human connection. God Is Not Three Guys in the Sky Language about the Trinity confuses people because meanings of words change. “Hypostatic union” is indeed defined as two natures, divine and human, in one person—Florian was correct about that. And “Trinity” refers to three persons in one God. The center of confusion is the word “person.” We moderns envision persons as individuals, but that’s not what the theologians who formulated the doctrine of the Trinity had in mind. When the word "person" first entered the doctrinal debate, it meant a mask or role—what an actor on the Greek stage put on—and it did not mean a distinct personality or a separate "I" as it does today. Persona may be closer to the original meaning than “person.” T...
Read more